The optical in-screen fingerprint scanner in the pricier A50 feels more like an inconvenience than an upgrade
One of the major differences between the Galaxy A50 and the more affordable A30 is the fingerprint scanner. The A50 comes equipped with a fingerprint scanner embedded under the screen, while the A30 features a traditional fingerprint reader on the back. The fingerprint on the A50 is not the same ultrasonic reader as on the flagship S10 series, but instead it uses optical technology, similarly to what you get on, say, the OnePlus 6T.
There are definitely benefits to having the fingerprint scanner on the front: it’s a much more natural position and you don’t need to lift up the phone to unlock it, but this particular fingerprint reader on the A50 feels like a disappointment.
Half the time, it works, and then half the time it fails to get a proper read, so using it feels like a lottery and it often takes more than one attempt to unlock the phone. This is an issue we have had with these first-gen optical fingerprint readers and it’s an issue here.
In comparison, the traditional fingerprint reader on the back of the A30 works every time and it feels both more reliable and faster. Out of these two, we would take the reliability over the modernism any day.
Samsung One UI does not look that bad
Both the A50 and the A30 are powered by Samsung’s latest One UI version 1.1 based on top of Android 9 Pie.
This is the same software that you get on the flagship Galaxy S10 series, and we don’t need to repeat ourselves: it feels less cluttered than previous TouchWiz versions, it comes with settings that are easier to navigate and with a few useful new features like a Night mode (turns white backdrops in the interface to black for more comfortable use at night) and little conveniences like menus that are easier to reach with a single hand. Yes, the icons and the overall styling still appear a bit childish, but overall, we are left with positive impressions.
You also get the option to switch to the gesture-based navigation that can replace the traditional three-button Android nav. The gestures are the following: swipe up from the bottom to go home, swipe up and hold to see multitasking cards, and swipe sideways from the edge of the screen to go back.
And yes, Bixby is also here. It does not have a dedicated physical key (thankfully!), but you can bring it up by either going to the Bixby Home home screen panel or by long-pressing the power button (you have to enable this option first in settings).
Processor, Performance and Memory
Neither feels fast or smooth, and it’s Samsung’s fault
Both the A50 and the A30 are powered by octa-core Samsung-made Exynos chips, but there is a tangible difference in the actual performance.
The big takeaway that we want to start with here is that neither of these two phones feels fast or smooth, but the A30 specifically often feels a bit sluggish. You commonly see dropped frames, animations are not as smooth as on many other phones and so on. For us, this is one of the major downsides of affordable Samsung phones, and these ones are no exception. This is not something that we blame on the chip, but more so on the Samsung One UI.
Still, in terms of processors, the Galaxy A50 comes with the Exynos 7 Octa 9610 and either 4GB or 6GB RAM. If you are wondering what this chip equals to in the Snapdragon world, well… it’s about on par with the Snapdragon 660 chip, which in turn is actually slower than a Snapdragon 821 flagship grade chip from two years ago.
The Galaxy A30 comes with the Exynos 7 Octa 7904 with 4GB of RAM, and it’s about 50% slower.
Graphics performance is also about twice better on the A50, so if gaming is a concern… well, neither one is a great choice, but out of the two the A50 is definitely the one you should go with.
Take a look at the performance benchmark scores right below:
There is one more big difference between these two phones and it’s in the amount of on-board storage. You have a generous 128GB of on-board storage on the A50, while the A30 has half that at 64 gigs of storage. Both phones also support microSD cards for memory expansion, should you need more storage in the future.
Both are okay, no huge differences between the two
Let’s get this out of the way: while technically you get a triple camera on the A50 and a dual camera on the A30, there is not a huge difference in terms of actual camera performance between these phones.
Let’s first get the specs out of the way. On the Galaxy A50, you get the following set of cameras:
Rear Cameras: 25MP f/1.7 main + 8MP f/2.2 ultra-wide + 5MP depth
Front Cameras: 25MP
On the Galaxy A30, you have slightly lower resolution and you don’t get the depth camera sensor (but you still have the Live Focus “portrait” mode):
Rear Cameras: 16MP f/1.7 main + 5MP f/2.2 ultra-wide
Front Cameras: 16MP
Both support the excellent Samsung camera app that you can quickly and conveniently start with a double press on the power button.
So… how do images actually turn out?
Daylight quality is quite decent on both phones: the holy grail of good smartphone photos are the great colors and Samsung does a good job in that regard with lively, pleasing colors. The difference between the A50 and A30 seems to boil down mostly to the amount of detail: the A50 captures the more detailed photos, while the A30 lacks a bit in that regard.
The ultra-wide angle camera is a useful addition when you have plentiful light. The quality is definitely not as good as with the main camera: you have less detail and distortion around the edges, but in exchange, you can capture some interesting perspectives and shoot in tight spaces.
On the video side, both the A50 and A30 can record with both the main cameras or ultra-wide angle cameras, which is a nice extra. Video recordings max out at 1080p video at 30 frames per second, but the bigger limitation is that you cannot switch between the two cameras, so once you start recording with the main camera, for instance, you cannot switch to the ultra wide one midway.
In terms of quality, you get a better video stabilization on the A50, while on the A30 videos turn out very shaky and jittery. The continuous auto-focus is also faster and more reliable on the A50.
Still, we find that compared to alternatives, the video quality you get is inferior: the Nokia 7.1 for example is perfectly capable of recording 4K video, and so is the popular Pocophone F1.
Finally, we should also say that the A50 supports slow-motion video recording at up to 240 frames per second (played slowed down 8 times) at 720p. This is a fun option to have, even though it’s probably not something that you will use very often. The A30 does not support slo-mo video recording.
Disappointing loudspeaker quality
On both the A50 and the A30 you get a single bottom-firing loudspeaker.
Overall, both phones do not get a very good quality out of that loudspeaker. The A50 is the slightly louder one, but the sound on both lacks any form of depth and is very, very tinny, piercing the ears as you listen. Again, we don’t have sky-high expectations, but sound quality via the loudspeaker was still a disappointment.
On a more positive note, we did not have much of an issue with the in-call speaker on these phones. The earpiece is located right above the front camera and you get a sufficient amount of volume and a decent amount of clarity during calls. On the other end of the line, there are no major issues as well, and your callers will be able to hear you clear enough. Of course, more premium phones with support for modern technologies like voice-over-LTE will deliver a noticeable clearer sound, but we don’t expect such features in affordable phones just yet.
Solid battery performance
Both the A50 and the A30 come with an equally sized 4,000mAh battery on board.
And they both last a long time.
The two scored great on our proprietary battery test. With results close to the 11 hour mark, the A50 and A30 actually outlast most current-day flagships by a good margin. In real life, you will be able to get through even the longest days on a single charge with no issues and with moderate use you should get a good two days between charges. Excellent!
You also have support for quick charging on board. The chargers that come in the box with both phones output a maximum of 15 watts and it takes around an hour and 40 minutes to recharge the phones with them. Just as you’d expect in 2019, both new A series come with a USB-C port.
You don’t have any fancy wireless charging superpower on either one, though.
So… let’s sum things up.
The Galaxy A50 and the Galaxy A30 actually differ a great deal in terms of price. In the United States, you can find both these phones unlocked over at B&H, and the Galaxy A50 costs $300, while the A50 rocks a price of $230. In Europe and the rest of the world, the price delta bteween the two is bigger: the A50 costs 350 euro in Europe, while the A30 sells for just around 200 euro.
Is it worth paying so much money for the A50 considering that the differences from the A30 are not that huge? Well, let’s take a look: the difference in photo and video quality is there, but it is subtle, both phones do not feel fast, but the A30 often feels a bit sluggish, which is annoying, and finally, in terms of screen quality and battery life we found practically no differences. And we like the traditional fingerprint on the A30 more than the not so reliable in-screen fingerprint on the A50.
So unless you care deeply about gaming and performance, we are not convinced you should spend the extra cash for the very slight upgrades that you get with the A50, and ultimately, the A30 just feels like the device that offers better value for the money.
So should you buy any of these over the Moto G7s and the other affordable phone contenders? Despite the few downsides, we think that the new A series have mostly nailed it, especially the A30.